Home / Roll technology
HSS Rolls for Long Products Rolling: Types, Performance and Cooling
HSS rolls can roll two to four times more tonnage per pass than conventional cast iron in bar and rebar finishing stands. But not every “HSS” roll is the same, and not every mill gets the same result. This guide explains the four types, what to expect from each, and the cooling conditions that decide whether HSS pays off.
Why HSS rolls came to long products mills
Steel mills want more tonnage with less downtime. Every roll change, every redress and every stop costs production. HSS (high speed steel) rolls were developed to answer that demand.
HSS rolls were first used in the finishing stands of hot strip mills, where they improved the quality of the rolled product and reduced roll maintenance. That success led long products mills — bar, rebar and wire rod — to adopt HSS as well, and today HSS is used from intermediate to finishing stands.
For long products, HSS rolls are made in two main ways: by centrifugal casting, or by sintering (powder metallurgy with hot isostatic pressing). Centrifugally cast HSS is the most common, because many foundries around the world can make it. Sintered high-vanadium grades are made by only a few producers in the US and Europe.
The four types of “HSS” roll
Many suppliers offer “HSS” rolls, but some of them are really high boron or high chrome irons, which do not suit every mill. It helps to separate the four types:
Centrifugal cast — high boron
+
- The lowest-cost “HSS” option
- 2–3× the output of conventional cast iron
- Lower price than tungsten carbide
- Uses the full barrel surface, unlike carbide composite rolls
−
- Does not work in every mill
- Finishing stands only
- Production time 120–130 days ex-works
Centrifugal cast — high carbon
+
- The most mature HSS type in long products rolling
- Can be adjusted for slitting and dog-bone stands
- 3–4× the output of conventional cast iron
- Lower price than tungsten carbide
- Uses the full barrel surface, unlike carbide composite rolls
- Works from intermediate to finishing stands
−
- Production time 120–130 days ex-works
Hybrid — centrifugal cast and sintered
+
- About half the price of tungsten carbide
- Much more tolerant of thermal fatigue
- Good resistance at the sharp apex of slitting passes
- Suits many different rolling applications
- Production time 80–100 days
−
- A ring system, assembled as a composite roll
- Limited production capacity
Sintered PM high-vanadium (9V type)
+
- Still the best-performing material when output is the main goal
−
- Expensive
- Made only by a few producers holding the process rights
- Very long delivery because of limited capacity
The hybrid and sintered types have the chemistry of true high speed steel, and they perform better than centrifugally cast “HSS”.
Performance in a bar mill: acicular, HSS and hybrid
The table below is a sample analysis from a SINOPAC client’s bar mill, comparing conventional acicular rolls with high carbon cast HSS and hybrid HSS in the last four finishing stands. Total tonnage per roll = tons per pass × number of passes × campaigns per roll.
| Stand / pass | Material | Tons per pass | Passes | Tons per entry | Avg. redress (mm) | Roll life (mm) | Campaigns per roll | Total tons per roll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 — Dog-bone | Acicular | 600 | 8 | 4,800 | 3.5 | 55 | 15 | 72,000 |
| 15 — Dog-bone | HSS | 1,500 | 8 | 12,000 | 2.0 | 45 | 22 | ≥ 264,000 |
| 15 — Dog-bone | Hybrid | 2,100 | 8 | 16,800 | 1.8 | 45 | 25 | ≥ 420,000 |
| 16 — Slitting | Acicular | 600 | 8 | 4,800 | 3.5 | 55 | 15 | 72,000 |
| 16 — Slitting | HSS | 1,500 | 8 | 12,000 | 2.0 | 45 | 22 | ≥ 264,000 |
| 16 — Slitting | Hybrid | 2,100 | 8 | 16,800 | 1.8 | 45 | 25 | ≥ 420,000 |
| 17 — Leader | Acicular | 700 | 7 | 4,900 | 3.0 | 55 | 18 | 88,200 |
| 17 — Leader | HSS | 1,750 | 7 | 12,250 | 2.0 | 45 | 22 | ≥ 269,500 |
| 17 — Leader | Hybrid | 2,450 | 7 | 17,150 | 1.7 | 45 | 26 | ≥ 445,900 |
| 18 — Notching | Acicular | 300 | 8 | 2,400 | 3.5 | 55 | 15 | 36,000 |
| 18 — Notching | HSS | 1,100 | 8 | 8,800 | 3.5 | 45 | 15 | ≥ 132,000 |
| 18 — Notching | Hybrid | 1,800 | 8 | 14,400 | 3.5 | 45 | 15 | ≥ 216,000 |
In this mill, HSS rolled about 2.5 times more per pass than acicular in the dog-bone, slitting and leader stands, and hybrid HSS about 3.5 times more. Because HSS also needs a smaller redress, each roll lasts more campaigns — so the tonnage per roll rose from about 72,000 t to more than 260,000 t with HSS, and more than 420,000 t with hybrid.
Actual performance depends on each mill’s rolling conditions — pass design, speed, reduction, stock temperature and, above all, cooling.
Cooling: the condition that decides HSS performance
Good water cooling is vital for every roll material, but it is critical for HSS and other hardened grades. Poor cooling causes thermal cracking and spalling and quickly cancels the tonnage advantage. As a guide:
- Water pressure usually 2–6 bar, depending on the stand
- Water velocity no more than 4 m/s
- Water temperature no higher than 35 °C
- Unlike wide strip rolling, water is often applied only on the delivery side, because of space limits
- Cooling water is often applied only to the pass in use
| Stand | Bar no. 12 | Bar no. 14 | Bar no. 13 | Bar no. 14 | Bar no. 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roll size (mm) | 400 × 600 | 470 × 850 | 380 × 600 | 340 × 600 | 330 × 650 |
| Groove | Round 34 | Round 22 | Slitting | Slitting | Oval |
| Groove area (mm²) | 908 | 380 | 370 | 330 | 910 |
| Reduction (%) | — | 30–35 | 18 | 10 | 18 |
| Rolling speed (m/s) | 7 | 1–4 | 10–11 | 11–12 | 5–6 |
| Rolling load (t) | 30 | 40 | 16 | 9 | 20 |
| Water volume per pass | 30 | 50 | 30 | 30 | 48 |
| Pressure (kgf/cm²) | 4–5 | 5 | 3–5 | 3–5 | 4–5 |
Nozzles are set as a combination of direct nozzles on the pass and 1-inch indirect nozzles, depending on the stand.
Which HSS is right for your mill?
The right choice depends on the stand position, the product mix, the slitting or notching passes, and your cooling system. A high boron roll can be the most economical option in a well-cooled finishing stand, while a high carbon or hybrid roll is the safer choice for slitting and dog-bone passes.
SINOPAC reviews your stand data, current grade and campaign results before recommending a grade, so you pay for the performance you need. Send us your drawings and mill data, and we will reply with a grade proposal and an offer.